Guides · PeptideU · 9 min read

VEGF and Anti-VEGF Therapies — Side Effects: What Studies Report

The short answer

Most published safety data linked to the term "VEGF" come from drugs that block VEGF, not from VEGF given as a therapy. Researchers have reported intraocular inflammation with brolucizumab and with high-dose aflibercept, ocular safety summaries for faricimab, a bleeding case report with bevacizumab, and kidney findings with a kinase inhibitor. Preclinical VEGF-B and bispecific antibody work carried no human safety data. This page summarises those reports only and gives no guidance.

What the term covers in the published literature

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a family of secreted signalling proteins that act on endothelial receptors to regulate blood vessel formation, vascular permeability and tissue perfusion. A 2025 review in Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy summarised VEGF signalling from molecular mechanisms through to therapeutic targeting in health and disease, describing the pathway as central to both normal vascular maintenance and to disorders driven by abnormal vessel growth (PMID 40383803).

That distinction matters for any safety question. In the peer-reviewed record, adverse events discussed under the heading "VEGF" overwhelmingly belong to agents that inhibit VEGF signalling — monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, fusion proteins and small-molecule kinase inhibitors used in ophthalmology and oncology. Reports describing the administration of VEGF protein itself to humans as a treatment do not appear in the verified literature summarised on this page, and that absence is stated here plainly rather than filled in with inference.

This page is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice; consult a licensed physician for any question about a medicine, a symptom or a treatment decision. Nothing below is a protocol, a comparison of products, or a suggestion that any compound be used.

Ocular anti-VEGF therapy: What Studies Report

The densest body of safety reporting concerns drugs injected into the eye to suppress VEGF-driven leakage and neovascularisation in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Across these agents, the adverse events researchers described most often were inflammatory or vascular events inside the eye rather than systemic complaints.

Brolucizumab: What Studies Report

A 2021 review in the Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research catalogued the side effects reported with brolucizumab, with intraocular inflammation and associated retinal vascular events forming the core of the safety discussion (PMID 34840689). The authors framed these as events that emerged in post-approval reporting and prompted closer scrutiny of inflammatory signals after intravitreal injection.

A 2022 guidance paper in Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología set out management recommendations for brolucizumab, describing how clinicians were advised to recognise, grade and respond to inflammatory events after injection (PMID 35882576). The existence of a dedicated management document is itself informative: researchers treated the inflammatory signal as clinically consequential enough to warrant standardised surveillance rather than routine observation alone.

High-dose aflibercept: What Studies Report

A 2024 case series in BMC Ophthalmology described intraocular inflammation (IOI) related to 8 mg aflibercept, documenting inflammatory presentations following the higher-dose formulation (PMID 39623439). Because a case series counts events without a comparator arm, the authors could describe what occurred and in what pattern, but the design did not establish how often IOI occurred relative to lower-dose regimens or to other agents.

Faricimab: What Studies Report

Faricimab is a bispecific molecule that blocks both VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2, and it has been examined in several pooled analyses. A 2024 meta-analysis in Ophthalmologica evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab across nAMD, DME and RVO, reporting ocular adverse event data alongside visual and anatomical outcomes and describing the overall tolerability profile as consistent with established anti-VEGF therapy (PMID 39362194).

A 2024 systematic review and network meta-analysis in BMJ Open Ophthalmology assessed faricimab in nAMD against comparator anti-VEGF agents and reported both efficacy and safety endpoints within the same indirect-comparison framework (PMID 39043575). Separately, a 2024 review in the International Journal of Retina and Vitreous summarised real-world evidence for dual VEGF-A and ANG-2 inhibition with faricimab in nAMD and DME, drawing on clinical practice cohorts rather than randomised trials (PMID 38233896). Real-world series capture events in broader, less selected populations, but they also lack randomisation and standardised event adjudication, which the authors of such reviews generally treat as a limitation on interpretation.

Systemic VEGF blockade: What Studies Report

Bevacizumab and bleeding-related findings

Bevacizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody against VEGF-A used systemically in oncology. A 2024 report in Dermatology Online Journal described bevacizumab-induced subungual haemorrhage — bleeding beneath the nail plate — as a cutaneous adverse event attributed to the drug (PMID 39680968). This was a single-patient report. Case reports establish that an event can occur and generate hypotheses about mechanism; they do not estimate incidence, and researchers routinely note that a single observation cannot be generalised to a population.

Kinase inhibitors and kidney findings

Small-molecule kinase inhibitors used in oncology intersect multiple signalling pathways, and renal adverse events have been documented in individual patients. A 2021 case report in Cureus described dasatinib-induced nephrotic syndrome, with proteinuria developing during treatment (PMID 34912656). As with the bevacizumab report, the design was a single case: the authors documented the temporal association and clinical course rather than a causal rate.

Doing the math on a vial? The PeptideU app does reconstitution, units and dilution for you.

Try it free

Conditions involving VEGF elevation: What Studies Report

Some diseases are characterised by excess VEGF signalling rather than by its blockade, and the 2025 mechanistic review described how dysregulated VEGF activity contributes to pathological vascular permeability and abnormal vessel formation across disease states (PMID 40383803). POEMS syndrome is one such context studied in trials of immunomodulatory drugs. A 2020 prospective single-arm clinical trial in Internal Medicine evaluated lenalidomide in patients with thalidomide-refractory POEMS syndrome, reporting treatment outcomes and tolerability in that cohort (PMID 32009091). A single-arm design means observed events cannot be separated from the underlying disease course without a control group.

Preclinical and early-stage findings: What Studies Report

Two entries in the verified set describe laboratory rather than clinical work, and neither carried human safety data.

A 2024 study in Circulation Research examined the contribution of VEGF-B-induced endocardial endothelial cell lineage in physiological versus pathological cardiac hypertrophy, distinguishing between adaptive and maladaptive patterns of heart growth in the experimental model (PMID 38655691). The study addressed mechanism in a controlled biological system; researchers did not report clinical adverse events, and findings at that level do not transfer directly to human outcomes.

A 2025 report in iScience described the design of an Fc-engineered tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF, with the authors reporting cooperative biological effects of the dual-target construct in preclinical characterisation (PMID 40034861). This was molecular engineering and preclinical evaluation; no human tolerability profile was established in that work.

Tracking research? Log entries with dates, lots and notes — records, never plans.

Get the app

What the reported events look like side by side

Agent or contextSettingEvent or focus reportedStudy type
BrolucizumabIntravitreal, retinal diseaseIntraocular inflammation and related vascular events (PMID 34840689)Review
BrolucizumabIntravitreal, retinal diseaseRecognition and management guidance for inflammatory events (PMID 35882576)Guidance document
Aflibercept 8 mgIntravitrealIntraocular inflammation (PMID 39623439)Case series
FaricimabnAMD, DME, RVOPooled efficacy and ocular safety outcomes (PMID 39362194)Meta-analysis
FaricimabnAMD and DME, clinical practiceReal-world outcomes of VEGF-A/ANG-2 inhibition (PMID 38233896)Review of real-world evidence
BevacizumabSystemic oncologySubungual haemorrhage (PMID 39680968)Case report
DasatinibSystemic oncologyNephrotic syndrome (PMID 34912656)Case report
VEGF-BCardiac hypertrophy modelEndocardial endothelial lineage contribution (PMID 38655691)Preclinical

Where human safety data are absent

Several questions that people bring to the phrase "VEGF side effects" are not answered by the literature verified for this page, and the honest answer is that the data are missing rather than reassuring:

Want the full course? Every compound, evidence-graded and cited, inside PeptideU.

Start learning free

How to read this evidence base

Three structural features shape what these reports can and cannot show. First, study design sets the ceiling on the claim: a case report of subungual haemorrhage documents that the event occurred in one patient receiving bevacizumab (PMID 39680968), while a meta-analysis of faricimab pooled randomised data across three retinal indications (PMID 39362194). Those are different grades of evidence about different questions.

Second, route matters. Intravitreal injection concentrates drug in the eye, and the events researchers described most often in that setting were ocular — inflammation and vascular occlusion (PMID 34840689). Systemic administration in oncology generated a different pattern of reports, including bleeding and renal findings (PMID 34912656).

Third, blocking a pathway is not the same as supplying it. The mechanistic review described VEGF signalling as pleiotropic across tissues, which is why interference with it produces effects in organs beyond the intended target (PMID 40383803). Findings about inhibitors cannot be inverted to predict what the ligand would do.

Readers evaluating any of this material should treat it as a summary of published reports, not as a basis for personal decisions. Questions about symptoms, medications or eligibility for a therapy belong with a licensed clinician who can assess an individual case.

References

Frequently asked questions

Do the cited studies describe side effects of VEGF itself or of drugs that block it?

Almost entirely the latter. The verified papers describe agents that inhibit VEGF signalling in the eye and in oncology. A 2025 mechanistic review summarised VEGF biology and its therapeutic targeting (PMID 40383803), but no trial in this set reported outcomes from giving VEGF protein to humans, so no such safety profile is described here.

What ocular events did researchers report with brolucizumab?

A 2021 review catalogued the reported side effects of brolucizumab, with intraocular inflammation and associated retinal vascular events forming the central concern (PMID 34840689). A 2022 guidance paper set out management recommendations for recognising and responding to those inflammatory events after intravitreal injection (PMID 35882576), indicating that clinicians treated the signal as requiring structured surveillance.

Was intraocular inflammation reported with high-dose aflibercept?

Yes. A 2024 case series in BMC Ophthalmology described intraocular inflammation related to 8 mg aflibercept, documenting the presentations observed (PMID 39623439). Because the design was a case series without a comparator group, researchers could characterise the events but could not estimate how frequently they occurred relative to other doses or agents.

What did the faricimab analyses report about safety?

A 2024 meta-analysis assessed intravitreal faricimab across neovascular AMD, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion, reporting ocular safety alongside efficacy outcomes (PMID 39362194). A network meta-analysis compared faricimab with other anti-VEGF agents in neovascular AMD (PMID 39043575), and a separate review summarised real-world experience with dual VEGF-A and ANG-2 inhibition (PMID 38233896).

Have systemic side effects been reported with VEGF-blocking drugs?

Individual cases have been published. A 2024 report described bevacizumab-induced subungual haemorrhage, bleeding beneath the nail plate (PMID 39680968), and a 2021 case report described nephrotic syndrome during dasatinib treatment (PMID 34912656). Both were single-patient reports, which document that an event occurred without establishing incidence or generalisability across treated populations.

Is there human safety data for the newer PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody?

Not in this verified set. A 2025 iScience paper reported the design of an Fc-engineered tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF and described cooperative biological effects in preclinical characterisation (PMID 40034861). The study did not report a human tolerability profile, so clinical adverse events for that construct are absent from the literature summarised here.

Do animal findings on VEGF-B say anything about human side effects?

No. A 2024 Circulation Research study examined the contribution of VEGF-B-induced endocardial endothelial cell lineage in physiological versus pathological cardiac hypertrophy in an experimental model (PMID 38655691). Researchers addressed mechanism rather than clinical tolerability, and preclinical cardiac findings do not translate directly into predicted human adverse events.

The PeptideU app

Track it. Calculate it. Actually understand it.

Research trackerLog every entry with dates, lots and notes — records, never plans.
CalculatorsReconstitution, units and dilution maths without the guesswork.
The UniversityEvery compound explained, evidence-graded, cited to the literature.
Get started freePeptideU Premium — $9.99/mo for the full curriculum, advanced tracking & giveaways

Download on theApp Store — Free

References

  1. PMID 40383803
  2. PMID 34840689
  3. PMID 35882576
  4. PMID 39623439
  5. PMID 39362194
  6. PMID 39043575
  7. PMID 38233896
  8. PMID 39680968
  9. PMID 34912656
  10. PMID 32009091
  11. PMID 38655691
  12. PMID 40034861
18+ · Educational purposes only
This page summarises published research for education — it is not medical advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to use, purchase, or dose any substance. Study parameters described are what researchers reported, not instructions. Consult a qualified clinician before any health decision.
Learn it properly — freeGet the PeptideU app