How Does Colistin Work? Mechanism of Action, Per the Research
Colistin (polymyxin E) is a prescription antibiotic. Published pharmacology describes it as a polycationic lipopeptide that binds the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide in the Gram-negative outer membrane, displaces stabilising calcium and magnesium ions, and permeabilises the envelope, leading to bacterial cell death. Secondary mechanisms, including oxidative damage and endotoxin neutralisation, remain proposed rather than settled. Resistance arises when bacteria chemically modify lipid A, including via the plasmid-borne mcr-1 gene. This page summarises that literature only.
Colistin, also known as polymyxin E, is a prescription antibiotic of the polymyxin class. Product labelling describes the marketed form as colistimethate sodium, a sulfomethylated derivative of colistin, and states that it is indicated for the treatment of acute or chronic infections caused by sensitive strains of certain Gram-negative bacilli, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This page summarises what the published pharmacology literature reports about how the molecule acts on bacterial cells. It does not describe how any product is used. This page is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice; consult a licensed physician about any medicine, indication or treatment decision.
The molecule and its class
Reviews of polymyxin chemistry describe colistin as a cyclic lipopeptide carrying a fatty acyl tail and multiple positively charged diaminobutyric acid residues, a structure that researchers have linked directly to its activity against Gram-negative organisms (PMID 31364069). A 2020 extended review of the 2000–2019 literature characterised colistin as an older agent that returned to clinical attention because of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, and summarised its chemistry, spectrum and pharmacology in that context (PMID 32284036). Clinical pharmacology reviews also distinguish colistin from polymyxin B, noting that the two differ in a single amino acid and, importantly, in the form in which each reaches the patient — colistimethate sodium being an inactive precursor that converts to colistin in the body, whereas polymyxin B is supplied in its active form (PMID 26488563).
The established mechanism: lipid A binding and outer-membrane disruption
The mechanism described most consistently across the polymyxin literature is a physicochemical attack on the Gram-negative outer membrane rather than inhibition of a classical enzyme or ribosomal target (PMID 31364069). It is usually presented as a sequence of steps.
Step 1 — electrostatic attraction to lipopolysaccharide
The outer leaflet of the Gram-negative outer membrane is dominated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), whose lipid A anchor carries phosphate groups that give the surface a strong net negative charge. Reviews reported that the polycationic polymyxin molecule is drawn to these anionic phosphate groups on lipid A, an interaction treated in the literature as the initial and defining binding event (PMID 32284036). Because this target is a structural lipid rather than a protein receptor, the literature does not describe a conventional receptor–ligand signalling cascade in the bacterium (PMID 31364069).
Step 2 — displacement of divalent cations
Adjacent LPS molecules are normally cross-bridged by divalent calcium and magnesium ions. Mechanistic reviews described polymyxins as competitively displacing those stabilising cations, which loosens the tightly packed LPS lattice and destabilises the membrane (PMID 32284036). The evidence that this interaction is decisive comes largely from the resistance side of the literature: when bacteria reduce the negative charge of lipid A, binding falls and susceptibility is lost (PMID 31364071).
Step 3 — permeabilisation and self-promoted uptake
Once the lattice is disturbed, the hydrophobic acyl tail of the molecule inserts into the membrane, increasing permeability and allowing further molecules to cross — a process the literature terms self-promoted uptake. Reviews reported that this leads to leakage of cell contents and bacterial death, and that the resulting activity is bactericidal and concentration-dependent (PMID 31364069). Related work on octapeptins, a structurally similar lipopeptide family, described the same general mode of envelope-targeting action and used it to explain activity against strains that have modified their lipid A (PMID 29848132).
| Stage | What the literature describes | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Target engagement | Polycationic peptide binds anionic phosphates on lipid A of LPS | PMID 32284036 |
| Membrane destabilisation | Displacement of bridging Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions between LPS molecules | PMID 32284036 |
| Entry and lysis | Acyl tail insertion, permeabilisation, bactericidal effect | PMID 31364069 |
| Loss of effect | Lipid A modification reduces net negative charge and binding | PMID 31364071 |
Doing the math on a vial? The PeptideU app does reconstitution, units and dilution for you.
Try it freeProposed mechanisms that remain under investigation
Beyond membrane disruption, reviews have catalogued secondary mechanisms that are discussed as hypotheses rather than settled pharmacology. These include oxidative damage to bacterial macromolecules following envelope injury and the neutralisation of free lipopolysaccharide, sometimes described as an anti-endotoxin effect (PMID 32284036). Work on next-generation polymyxin analogues noted that medicinal chemistry efforts have tried to separate antibacterial potency from toxicity, which implies the mechanistic basis of each is not fully resolved (PMID 31364086). Readers evaluating mechanism claims should note the distinction: lipid A binding and outer-membrane permeabilisation are the established account, while downstream oxidative and immunomodulatory effects are proposed extensions of it.
Why the spectrum is limited to Gram-negative organisms
Because the mechanism depends on LPS, the activity described in the literature is confined to Gram-negative bacteria that possess an LPS-bearing outer membrane; Gram-positive organisms, which lack that structure, are outside the spectrum (PMID 31364069). The 2020 extended review described colistin's relevance to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (PMID 32284036). Some genera are intrinsically outside that spectrum: a 2021 analysis of Aeromonas species examined intrinsic colistin resistance in that genus and the genetic determinants behind it (PMID 34205867).
Tracking research? Log entries with dates, lots and notes — records, never plans.
Get the appHow bacteria defeat the mechanism
Resistance research is, in effect, the strongest confirmation of the proposed mechanism, because nearly every described escape route alters the lipid A target itself.
Chromosomal regulation of lipid A
A review of polymyxin resistance mechanisms reported that two-component regulatory systems, notably PmrAB and PhoPQ, drive addition of 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose and phosphoethanolamine to lipid A, reducing its negative charge and therefore polymyxin binding (PMID 31364071). In Klebsiella pneumoniae, researchers specifically described loss or inactivation of the regulator mgrB among the chromosomal routes to colistin resistance (PMID 24794735).
Plasmid-mediated resistance: mcr-1 and mcr-2
In 2016 a microbiological and molecular study from China reported the first plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism, MCR-1, a phosphoethanolamine transferase identified in isolates from animals and human beings, and showed it was transferable between strains (PMID 26603172). The study reframed colistin resistance from a chromosomal, strain-limited problem into a mobile one. A subsequent investigation characterised MCR-2 and deciphered its contribution to colistin resistance (PMID 28487432).
Newer and unusual routes
A 2024 report described phage-mediated colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii, adding bacteriophage involvement to the known resistance repertoire (PMID 38301486). A 2025 study reported a colistin-induced transition from a non-mucoid to a mucoid phenotype in a resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST3351 lineage, an adaptive change with implications for virulence (PMID 41144657).
- Target modification: lipid A decorated with L-Ara4N or phosphoethanolamine (PMID 31364071)
- Regulator loss: mgrB inactivation in K. pneumoniae (PMID 24794735)
- Mobile genes: mcr-1 (PMID 26603172) and mcr-2 (PMID 28487432)
- Intrinsic resistance: described in Aeromonas spp. (PMID 34205867)
Colistin compared with polymyxin B
An update comparing the two polymyxins reported that, despite near-identical antibacterial mechanisms, they differ pharmacologically because colistin is given as an inactive precursor that must convert in the body while polymyxin B is already active, and the review discussed how this difference affects attainment of active drug concentrations (PMID 26488563). That same comparison is frequently cited when researchers discuss differences in toxicity profiles between the two agents (PMID 26488563).
Want the full course? Every compound, evidence-graded and cited, inside PeptideU.
Start learning freeNephrotoxicity and Neurotoxicity: What Studies Report
The toxicity literature is a central part of colistin pharmacology. The 2020 extended review reported that nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are the principal adverse effects associated with colistin and that toxicity concerns were a major reason the agent fell out of favour before its reintroduction for multidrug-resistant infections (PMID 32284036). The polymyxin B versus colistin update examined comparative toxicity between the two agents alongside their pharmacokinetic differences (PMID 26488563). Efforts to design novel polymyxin-like antibiotics have been framed explicitly around reducing this toxicity burden while retaining Gram-negative activity (PMID 31364086). Only a prescribing clinician can assess what these risks mean for an individual patient; this page does not provide that assessment.
Where the mechanism research is heading
Two directions appear in the cited literature. The first is structural modification of the polymyxin scaffold: a review of novel polymyxin-like antibiotics described discovery programmes aimed at analogues with improved profiles (PMID 31364086). The second is the octapeptin family, where researchers asked whether these lipopeptides could act against extensively drug-resistant bacteria, including strains that have modified lipid A and become polymyxin-resistant (PMID 29848132). Both lines rest on the same mechanistic premise described above.
Doing the math on a vial? The PeptideU app does reconstitution, units and dilution for you.
Try it freeRegulatory and practical context
Colistimethate sodium is a prescription medicine, available only through a licensed prescriber, and its approved indications are those stated on the product label for infections due to sensitive strains of specified Gram-negative bacilli. Nothing on this page addresses whether colistin is appropriate for any person, condition or organism, and no dosing information is provided here. Susceptibility testing, indication selection and monitoring are clinical decisions. For a broader overview of the molecule, see the colistin learn page.
References
- Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study (The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2016)
- Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000-2019) (Emerging Microbes & Infections, 2020)
- History, Chemistry and Antibacterial Spectrum (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2019)
- Mechanisms of Polymyxin Resistance (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2019)
- Colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae (International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2014)
- Deciphering MCR-2 Colistin Resistance (mBio, 2017)
- Colistin Resistance in Aeromonas spp (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021)
- Phage-mediated colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii (Drug Resistance Updates, 2024)
- Colistin-induced transition from non-mucoid to mucoid phenotype in resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST3351 (Virulence, 2025)
- Polymyxin B versus colistin: an update (Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2015)
- Discovery of Novel Polymyxin-Like Antibiotics (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2019)
- Can octapeptin antibiotics combat extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria? (Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2018)
Frequently asked questions
What does colistin bind to in the bacterial cell?▾
Reviews described colistin as binding the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide in the Gram-negative outer membrane, attracted by the negative charge of lipid A phosphate groups (PMID 32284036). The target is a structural lipid rather than a protein receptor, which is why the literature describes a physicochemical membrane-disruption mechanism rather than a classical signalling cascade (PMID 31364069).
Why does colistin not work against Gram-positive bacteria?▾
Because the mechanism depends on lipopolysaccharide in an outer membrane, and Gram-positive bacteria lack that structure, reviews reported the spectrum is limited to Gram-negative organisms (PMID 31364069). The 2020 extended review discussed colistin's role against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens specifically, including Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species (PMID 32284036).
What is mcr-1 and why did it matter?▾
A 2016 study in China reported MCR-1, the first plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism, identified in isolates from animals and human beings and shown to be transferable between bacterial strains (PMID 26603172). A later investigation characterised MCR-2 and its contribution to resistance (PMID 28487432). Both encode enzymes that modify lipid A and reduce colistin binding.
How do bacteria become resistant without a plasmid?▾
Researchers described chromosomal routes in which two-component systems such as PmrAB and PhoPQ add aminoarabinose or phosphoethanolamine to lipid A, reducing its negative charge and lowering polymyxin binding (PMID 31364071). In Klebsiella pneumoniae, inactivation of the regulator mgrB was reported among the chromosomal mechanisms of colistin resistance (PMID 24794735).
What adverse effects does the colistin literature report?▾
The 2020 extended review reported nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity as the principal adverse effects linked with colistin, and noted that toxicity concerns contributed to its earlier decline in use (PMID 32284036). A comparison of polymyxin B and colistin examined toxicity alongside pharmacokinetic differences between the two agents (PMID 26488563). Risk assessment belongs to a prescribing clinician.
How does colistin differ from polymyxin B?▾
An update reported that the two agents share essentially the same antibacterial mechanism but differ pharmacologically, because colistin reaches patients as an inactive precursor requiring conversion while polymyxin B is supplied in active form (PMID 26488563). That difference is discussed in the literature in relation to active drug exposure and comparative toxicity (PMID 26488563).
Are newer antibiotics being developed from the same mechanism?▾
Yes. A review described discovery programmes for novel polymyxin-like antibiotics aimed at retaining Gram-negative activity with improved profiles (PMID 31364086). Separately, researchers examined whether octapeptins, structurally related lipopeptides, could act against extensively drug-resistant bacteria, including strains with modified lipid A (PMID 29848132).
Track it. Calculate it. Actually understand it.
References
This page summarises published research for education — it is not medical advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to use, purchase, or dose any substance. Study parameters described are what researchers reported, not instructions. Consult a qualified clinician before any health decision.