Guides · PeptideU · 8 min read

Growth Hormone Secretagogue Side Effects: What Studies Report

The short answer

Published safety information on growth hormone secretagogues is uneven. A 2025 BMJ Case Reports paper described hepatotoxicity induced by MK-677 in a single patient, rodent work linked ghrelin receptor signalling to adipose inflammation, insulin resistance and impaired memory acquisition, and veterinary studies evaluated daily capromorelin in cats and rhesus macaques. A 2018 review assessed the class for safety and efficacy. Large, long-term human adverse-event trials are largely absent from this literature, and this page describes findings rather than giving guidance.

This page is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice; consult a licensed physician about any health decision. It summarises what published papers reported about adverse events, tolerability and safety signals associated with growth hormone secretagogues (GHS), and it deliberately stops at description. Where the published record is thin or missing, that absence is stated plainly rather than filled in.

What "growth hormone secretagogue" refers to in the literature

Growth hormone secretagogues are compounds that act at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), the receptor for the endogenous peptide ghrelin. The label covers chemically unrelated molecules studied in very different settings: the orally active compound MK-677 (ibutamoren), described in a 2025 BMJ Case Reports paper on hepatotoxicity induced by MK-677 (PMID 40675653); capromorelin, evaluated for daily administration safety in cats in a 2018 veterinary pharmacology study (PMID 29057482); and the experimental secretagogue JMV2894, studied preclinically in the D2-mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (PMID 41223758). Because these are separate molecules tested in separate species, the reported tolerability of one does not describe the others.

A 2018 review in Sexual Medicine Reviews addressed the safety and efficacy of growth hormone secretagogues as a class (PMID 28400207), and a 2026 review in the American Journal of Sports Medicine surveyed peptide supplements and their therapeutic applications in sports medicine, a category into which secretagogues are frequently placed (PMID 42578445). Reviews of this kind aggregate existing reports; they do not generate new adverse-event rates.

Liver and Hepatic Signals: What Studies Report

The most direct human adverse-event document in this verified set is a case report. Researchers publishing in BMJ Case Reports in 2025 described hepatotoxicity induced by MK-677 (PMID 40675653). A single case report is a narrative account of one patient; the study design cannot establish how often such an event occurs, whether it depends on amount or duration of exposure, or whether co-exposures contributed. What it does establish is that a hepatic adverse event associated with this compound was considered clinically significant enough to publish.

No paper in this verified set reported liver monitoring outcomes across a controlled human cohort taking a growth hormone secretagogue, so the frequency of hepatic signals in humans is not characterised by the literature reviewed here. That is an absence of data, not evidence of safety.

Doing the math on a vial? The PeptideU app does reconstitution, units and dilution for you.

Try it free

Glucose, Insulin and Metabolic Signals: What Studies Report

Metabolic signalling is one of the most consistently examined areas in GHSR pharmacology. A 2013 study in Nutrition & Diabetes reported that the ghrelin receptor regulated high-fructose corn syrup-induced adipose inflammation and insulin resistance in a rodent model (PMID 24366371). That work concerned receptor biology under a dietary challenge rather than administration of a pharmaceutical secretagogue, but it is the kind of mechanistic finding that motivates attention to glucose handling when GHSR is stimulated.

On the clinical side, a 2009 study in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism examined the effects of an oral growth hormone secretagogue in older adults (PMID 19174493), and the 2018 class review assessed safety alongside efficacy for secretagogues generally (PMID 28400207). Readers looking for metabolic adverse-event numbers should consult those primary documents directly; this page does not restate figures beyond the scope of the titles and abstracts verified for it.

Appetite, Muscle and Body-Composition Signals: What Studies Report

Ghrelin-pathway activation is closely tied to appetite and to muscle biology, which is why many secretagogue papers sit in the cachexia and sarcopenia literature rather than the performance literature. A 2020 review in the Journal of Aging Science discussed ghrelin as a "thrifty hormone" in the context of maintaining muscle with age (PMID 34368393). A 2026 study in Peptides reported that ghrelin attenuated skeletal-muscle atrophy by regulating muscle protein degradation and lung inflammation in aged male mice with lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury (PMID 41722618). A 2025 preclinical paper in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy examined the growth hormone secretagogue JMV2894 in the D2-mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (PMID 41223758).

These are efficacy-oriented animal studies in disease models. They describe intended pharmacology, not adverse events in healthy humans, and the species and disease context limit how far the observations travel. Increased appetite, where it appears in this literature, is typically framed as a therapeutic objective in wasting conditions rather than as a side effect.

Tracking research? Log entries with dates, lots and notes — records, never plans.

Get the app

Cognitive and Neurological Signals: What Studies Report

Neural effects of ghrelin signalling have been examined at the circuit level. A 2022 paper in Neuropharmacology reported that ghrelin signalling in the dorsal CA1 region suppressed neuronal excitability and impaired memory acquisition via PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β cascades in a rodent model (PMID 34742928). The study was mechanistic and region-specific; it does not describe cognitive outcomes in people using a secretagogue, and no human cognitive safety trial appears in this verified set. Ghrelin biology has also been probed from the opposite direction: a 2024 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in JCI Insight tested a GHSR blocker in people with alcohol use disorder (PMID 39704175), which illustrates that the receptor is being investigated clinically for central nervous system indications in both agonist and antagonist directions.

Animal and Veterinary Safety Studies: What Studies Report

Two of the more explicitly safety-framed papers in this set come from veterinary and laboratory-animal medicine. Researchers evaluated the safety of daily administration of capromorelin in cats in a 2018 study published in the Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (PMID 29057482), and a 2024 paper in JAALAS evaluated the safety and efficacy of capromorelin in rhesus macaques (PMID 38423529). Studies designed around repeated dosing with safety as a primary endpoint are comparatively rare in the secretagogue literature, which is one reason veterinary data are cited so often in discussions of this class.

PaperModelFraming
Hepatotoxicity induced by MK-677 (2025)Human, single caseAdverse event report
Daily capromorelin in cats (2018)FelineSafety evaluation
Capromorelin in rhesus macaques (2024)Non-human primateSafety and efficacy
Oral secretagogue in older adults (2009)HumanClinical effects
Ghrelin signalling in dCA1 (2022)RodentMechanistic, memory
Ghrelin receptor and HFCS-induced insulin resistance (2013)RodentMechanistic, metabolic

Want the full course? Every compound, evidence-graded and cited, inside PeptideU.

Start learning free

Where the human safety record is absent

Several things commonly asked about this class are not answered by the papers verified for this page, and it is more useful to say so than to speculate:

Ibutamoren (MK-677) has not been approved as a human medicine by the US Food and Drug Administration, and material labelled for research use only is not manufactured to clinical standards. That regulatory framing is factual context, not legal advice.

How the class reviews frame the question

Narrative reviews are where most readers first meet this topic. The 2018 Sexual Medicine Reviews article was written explicitly around the safety and efficacy of growth hormone secretagogues (PMID 28400207), and the 2026 American Journal of Sports Medicine review placed peptide supplements, including secretagogue-type compounds, in a sports medicine context (PMID 42578445). A review's conclusions inherit the limitations of the studies it summarises: when the underlying trials are small, short, or conducted in animals, a favourable summary sentence does not upgrade that evidence.

Doing the math on a vial? The PeptideU app does reconstitution, units and dilution for you.

Try it free

Reading adverse-event literature on this class

  1. Check the species. Much of the mechanistic ghrelin-pathway work cited above was rodent (PMID 41722618, PMID 34742928).
  2. Check the molecule. Capromorelin safety findings (PMID 38423529) do not describe MK-677 or JMV2894 (PMID 41223758).
  3. Check the direction of the intervention. The 2024 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested a GHSR blocker rather than an agonist (PMID 39704175).
  4. Check whether safety was an endpoint at all. Efficacy studies in disease models often report tolerability only incidentally.

For background on what these compounds are and how the receptor pathway was characterised, PeptideU's growth hormone secretagogue course (/learn/growth-hormone-secretagogue/) covers the pharmacology; this page stays on the safety and adverse-event literature. Neither page recommends use of any compound.

References

Frequently asked questions

What did published reports note about liver effects?

The clearest human adverse-event document is a 2025 BMJ Case Reports paper describing hepatotoxicity induced by MK-677 (PMID 40675653). Researchers reported a single case, so the study cannot show how often such an event occurs or what exposure pattern preceded it. No controlled human cohort with liver monitoring appears in the verified literature summarised here, which is an absence of data rather than reassurance.

Are there human clinical trials of growth hormone secretagogues?

Yes, though few. A 2009 study in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism examined the effects of an oral growth hormone secretagogue in older adults (PMID 19174493), and a 2018 review assessed the safety and efficacy of the class (PMID 28400207). A 2024 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested a GHSR blocker, not an agonist, in alcohol use disorder (PMID 39704175).

What does the literature report about glucose and insulin?

A 2013 rodent study reported that the ghrelin receptor regulated high-fructose corn syrup-induced adipose inflammation and insulin resistance (PMID 24366371). That was receptor biology under a dietary challenge rather than administration of a pharmaceutical secretagogue. The 2018 class review covered safety alongside efficacy (PMID 28400207). No human adverse-event incidence figures for glucose handling appear in the verified papers used here.

Do animal safety studies exist for this class?

Yes. Researchers evaluated the safety of daily administration of capromorelin in cats in 2018 (PMID 29057482), and a 2024 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of capromorelin in rhesus macaques (PMID 38423529). Both are safety-framed designs, which are uncommon in this field. Findings in cats and non-human primates describe those species and that molecule, not other secretagogues in humans.

Has any study reported cognitive or memory effects?

A 2022 Neuropharmacology study reported that ghrelin signalling in the dorsal CA1 region suppressed neuronal excitability and impaired memory acquisition via PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β cascades in rodents (PMID 34742928). The study was mechanistic and region-specific. No human cognitive safety trial of a growth hormone secretagogue appears among the papers verified for this page, so human relevance is not established by this literature.

Is long-term human safety data available?

Not in the verified literature summarised here. The 2018 review discussed safety and efficacy of the class (PMID 28400207) and a 2026 review placed peptide supplements in a sports medicine context (PMID 42578445), but no multi-year human follow-up study was identified. The longest safety-focused designs cited were veterinary, in cats (PMID 29057482) and rhesus macaques (PMID 38423529).

Do findings for one secretagogue apply to another?

The published record treats these as separate molecules. Hepatotoxicity was reported with MK-677 in a case report (PMID 40675653); capromorelin was evaluated separately in cats and macaques (PMID 29057482, PMID 38423529); and JMV2894 was studied preclinically in a Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse model (PMID 41223758). Shared receptor targeting does not mean shared adverse-event profiles across compounds or species.

The PeptideU app

Track it. Calculate it. Actually understand it.

Research trackerLog every entry with dates, lots and notes — records, never plans.
CalculatorsReconstitution, units and dilution maths without the guesswork.
The UniversityEvery compound explained, evidence-graded, cited to the literature.
Get started freePeptideU Premium — $9.99/mo for the full curriculum, advanced tracking & giveaways

Download on theApp Store — Free

References

  1. PMID 40675653
  2. PMID 39704175
  3. PMID 28400207
  4. PMID 34368393
  5. PMID 34742928
  6. PMID 29057482
  7. PMID 41722618
  8. PMID 24366371
  9. PMID 42578445
  10. PMID 41223758
  11. PMID 38423529
  12. PMID 19174493
18+ · Educational purposes only
This page summarises published research for education — it is not medical advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to use, purchase, or dose any substance. Study parameters described are what researchers reported, not instructions. Consult a qualified clinician before any health decision.
Learn it properly — freeGet the PeptideU app