What Is Mecasermin Rinfabate? Definition and What Research Reports
Mecasermin rinfabate is the non-proprietary name for a recombinant complex of human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) bound to its principal carrier protein, recombinant human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3), marketed under the trade name iPLEX. It is a protein-based biologic rather than a short synthetic peptide. Published reviews described the binding-protein pairing as a way to alter IGF-I pharmacokinetics and tolerability, and examined its investigation in severe primary IGF-I deficiency and several metabolic conditions. This page is definitional and educational only.
Definition
Mecasermin rinfabate is the international non-proprietary name for a 1:1 molar complex of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3), developed under the trade name iPLEX and referred to in the literature as the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex; a 2005 profile in Drugs in R&D catalogued the compound under this name alongside the variant spellings "mecaserimin rinfibate" that appeared in early records (PMID 15777106). In plain terms, the name describes one hormone-like protein packaged together with the carrier protein that normally transports it in human circulation, produced by recombinant DNA technology rather than extracted from tissue.
What Class of Molecule It Is
Mecasermin rinfabate is not a small synthetic peptide of the kind assembled on a solid-phase synthesiser. It is a two-component recombinant protein complex. The first component, IGF-I, is a single-chain polypeptide of 70 amino acids with structural homology to proinsulin. The second component, IGFBP-3, is a much larger glycoprotein that in the body binds the large majority of circulating IGF-I and, together with an acid-labile subunit, forms the ternary complex that acts as the body's IGF reservoir.
Where the molecule comes from
Both halves are recombinant: the human gene sequences are expressed in engineered host cells, purified, and then combined so that the IGF-I is presented already bound to its carrier. The stated pharmacological rationale, as summarised in a 2008 review of the complex in Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, was that pairing IGF-I with IGFBP-3 changes how the growth factor is handled after administration compared with free rhIGF-I given alone (PMID 18363546). The single-agent, unbound form of recombinant IGF-I carries its own separate non-proprietary name, mecasermin, which is why the two terms are frequently confused.
How the Term Is Used in Peptide Research
Within the growth-factor literature, "mecasermin rinfabate" is used in three fairly narrow ways:
- As a product name. Papers use it interchangeably with "rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3" and "iPLEX" when describing the specific manufactured complex rather than IGF-I biology in general.
- As a pharmacological contrast term. Authors invoke it when contrasting bound IGF-I delivery with free IGF-I delivery, because the binding protein is the variable under discussion (PMID 18363546).
- As an indication marker. The term appears in reviews of severe primary IGF-I deficiency and growth hormone insensitivity, and in reviews surveying investigational metabolic applications (PMID 16610982).
Because the complex is a licensed biologic in some jurisdictions rather than a research-only material, literature about it sits in clinical pharmacology journals rather than in the preclinical peptide-chemistry literature where many other entries in this glossary live. This page is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice; consult a licensed physician for any question about a medical condition or a medication.
Doing the math on a vial? The PeptideU app does reconstitution, units and dilution for you.
Try it freeWhat the Published Literature Reports
Three reference-level publications form the core of the accessible literature summarised here. A 2005 Drugs in R&D adis profile described mecasermin rinfabate as the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex under development for growth failure associated with growth hormone insensitivity and for several additional metabolic indications (PMID 15777106). A 2006 review in Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy examined the efficacy and safety record assembled to that point, and researchers framed the complex as an approach intended to deliver IGF-I while limiting the tolerability problems associated with unbound recombinant IGF-I (PMID 16610982). A 2008 review in Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology focused specifically on the metabolism and toxicology of the complex marketed as iPLEX (PMID 18363546).
The recurring theme across these sources is pharmacokinetic modification. Free IGF-I is cleared rapidly and, because of its structural similarity to insulin, can act at the insulin receptor. The reviews reported that binding IGF-I to IGFBP-3 before administration was intended to extend circulating exposure and to moderate the acute, insulin-like effects of a free growth factor bolus (PMID 18363546). Reported clinical interest centred on growth failure in children whose bodies produce growth hormone but cannot respond to it normally, a setting in which IGF-I replacement rather than growth hormone is the physiological target (PMID 16610982).
| Publication | Type | Focus as described |
|---|---|---|
| Drugs in R&D, 2005 (PMID 15777106) | Drug profile | Naming, composition as rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3, development status |
| Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2006 (PMID 16610982) | Review | Efficacy and safety of mecasermin rinfabate |
| Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 2008 (PMID 18363546) | Review | Metabolism and toxicology of the iPLEX complex |
Tolerability and Safety Signals: What Studies Report
Safety discussion in this literature is dominated by the insulin-like activity of IGF-I. The 2006 efficacy-and-safety review examined hypoglycaemia as the characteristic class concern for recombinant IGF-I therapy and discussed the binding-protein complex in that context (PMID 16610982). The 2008 toxicology-oriented review likewise addressed the toxicological profile of the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex rather than treating it as pharmacologically identical to free IGF-I (PMID 18363546). Neither review is reproduced here in numerical detail, and no dosing figures are stated on this page because dose selection for a growth-factor biologic is a clinical decision made under medical supervision, not a reference-entry fact.
Tracking research? Log entries with dates, lots and notes — records, never plans.
Get the appRegulatory and Naming Context
Two practical points help readers interpret older sources:
- Mecasermin and mecasermin rinfabate are different entries. Mecasermin is recombinant IGF-I alone; mecasermin rinfabate is IGF-I complexed with IGFBP-3 (PMID 15777106). Literature searches that conflate the two will return mismatched safety and pharmacokinetic material.
- Trade names travel with the term. The complex appears in the literature as iPLEX, which is the label used in the 2008 pharmacology review (PMID 18363546). Commercial availability of biologics changes over time and by jurisdiction, and regulatory status is not addressed on this page.
Mecasermin rinfabate is not a research chemical distributed for laboratory use in the way many investigational peptides are; it is a manufactured biologic whose literature sits in the clinical-pharmacology domain. Nothing here describes how the compound is administered, in what quantity, or for how long.
Summary of the Entry
Mecasermin rinfabate names a recombinant IGF-I/IGFBP-3 complex, developed as iPLEX, whose defining feature is that the growth factor is supplied already bound to its natural carrier protein. Published reviews described this pairing as an attempt to alter the pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile of IGF-I therapy and surveyed its investigation in growth failure related to growth hormone insensitivity and in metabolic settings (PMID 16610982, PMID 18363546). Readers comparing sources should confirm whether a given paper refers to the complex or to unbound mecasermin, because the two names describe different products.
Want the full course? Every compound, evidence-graded and cited, inside PeptideU.
Start learning freeReferences
- Mecasermin rinfabate: rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex: iPLEX (Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, 2008)
- Efficacy and safety of mecasermin rinfabate (Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2006)
- Mecasermin rinfabate: insulin-like growth factor-I/insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, mecaserimin rinfibate, rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 (Drugs in R&D, 2005)
Frequently asked questions
What does the name "mecasermin rinfabate" actually mean?▾
It is the non-proprietary name for a complex of recombinant human IGF-I joined with recombinant human IGF binding protein-3, described in a 2005 drug profile under the designation rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 and the trade name iPLEX (PMID 15777106). The "mecasermin" portion refers to the recombinant IGF-I component and "rinfabate" signals that it is supplied complexed with the binding protein.
Is mecasermin rinfabate the same thing as mecasermin?▾
No. Mecasermin is recombinant IGF-I on its own, while mecasermin rinfabate is that growth factor supplied already bound to recombinant IGFBP-3, which is how the 2005 profile distinguished the two entries (PMID 15777106). Reviews of the complex discussed its pharmacology separately from free IGF-I precisely because the binding protein changes how the molecule behaves (PMID 18363546).
Why was IGF-I combined with a binding protein at all?▾
Reviews reported that the pairing was intended to alter the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of IGF-I administration relative to the unbound growth factor, since IGFBP-3 is the carrier that binds most circulating IGF-I in the body (PMID 18363546). A 2006 efficacy and safety review discussed the same rationale when surveying the compound's clinical record (PMID 16610982).
Is mecasermin rinfabate a peptide?▾
Loosely speaking it contains one, but it is better described as a recombinant protein complex. IGF-I is a 70-amino-acid single-chain polypeptide, while IGFBP-3 is a larger glycoprotein carrier; the 2005 profile catalogued the product as the combined rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 entity rather than as a synthetic peptide (PMID 15777106). It is manufactured by recombinant expression, not solid-phase synthesis.
What conditions has the literature associated with this compound?▾
The 2006 review examined efficacy and safety data relevant to IGF-I replacement in growth failure linked to growth hormone insensitivity, alongside other investigational uses (PMID 16610982). The 2005 profile listed the development programme for the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex across several indications (PMID 15777106). This page does not describe treatment decisions, which belong with a licensed physician.
What safety issues do the reviews discuss?▾
Because IGF-I resembles insulin structurally, hypoglycaemia is the characteristic class concern, and the 2006 efficacy and safety review addressed tolerability in that framework (PMID 16610982). A 2008 review focused specifically on the metabolism and toxicology of the iPLEX complex (PMID 18363546). No dose figures or event rates are reproduced here, and this entry is educational only, not medical advice.
Why do older papers spell the name differently?▾
Early records used variant spellings such as "mecaserimin rinfibate" before the non-proprietary name settled, and the 2005 Drugs in R&D profile listed those variants alongside the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 designation (PMID 15777106). Searching all the variants, plus the trade name iPLEX used in the 2008 pharmacology review, returns a more complete set of sources (PMID 18363546).
Track it. Calculate it. Actually understand it.
References
This page summarises published research for education — it is not medical advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to use, purchase, or dose any substance. Study parameters described are what researchers reported, not instructions. Consult a qualified clinician before any health decision.